RULE id: abhinavagupta (13)
SOURCE: brihaddesi_sharma_1992 (vol_I_p080, vol_I_p083, vol_I_p084, vol_I_p087, vol_I_p088...)
SCOPE: proper_name family, Brihaddesi (Mātaṅga ~750 CE)
CONCEPT: Abhinavagupta
STATUS: canonical

ASSERTIONS:
  - [attribution] Abhinavagupta interprets kalā in the context of alaṅkāras as standing for śruti
    -- p.vol_I_p080 "Abhinavagupta comments that kalā here, stands for 'sruti'."
  - [attribution] Abhinavagupta made a remarkable contribution in the conception of the autonomy of musical note
    -- p.vol_I_p083 "As for the distinction between vowel and musical note, Abhinavagupta has made a remarkable contribution in the conception of the autonomy of musical note"
  - [citation] Abhinavagupta commented on Nāṭyaśāstra XXVIII.10 regarding the idea of Gāndharva being born of Sāmaveda
    -- p.vol_I_p084 "Abhinavagupta commenting on NS XXVIII, 10 has dwelt upon the idea of Gāndharva being born of Sāmaveda."
  - [attribution] Abhinavagupta discusses vaigunya in indriya and its relationship to excess or loss in svaras
    -- p.vol_I_p087 "Under indriya Abhinavagupta includes vāgindriya ( the human organ of speech ) in the primary sense"
  - [attribution] Abhinavagupta commented on the mutual relativity of utkarşa, apakarşa, āyatatva, and mārdava in the context of viņā
    -- p.vol_I_p088 "Abhinavagupta commenting on this passage of NS explains the mutual relativity of the constituents of both the pairs"
  - [attribution] Abhinavagupta authored commentary on the Nāṭyaśāstra (NS) explaining the relativity of pitch changes and the concept of nidarsana
    -- p.vol_I_p089 "Abhinavagupta says that on account of this relativity the respective order of the constituents of the two pairs is not maintained"
  - [citation] Abhinavagupta commented on Natyashastra XXVIII, 22 regarding anuranana and rañjakatā
    -- p.vol_I_p093 "(Abhi Bhā on NS XXVIII, 22, p. 13)"
  - [attribution] Abhinavagupta explained nigraha and paryagraha as alternatives paired in the context of omission
    -- p.vol_I_p099 "the pair has been explained by Abhinavagupta ( vide Abhi Bha on NS XXVIII, p. 27)"
  - [attribution] Abhinavagupta has commented on the variant recension of NS XXIX
    -- p.vol_I_p103 "This reading forms part of the variant recension of NS XXIX; Abhinavagupta has not commented on it."

CITED_RULES:
  - abhi  (attribution)
  - kalā  (attribution)
  - nāṭyaśāstra  (attribution)
  - nāṭyaśāstra  (citation)
  - nś xxviii  (attribution)
  - nś xxviii  (citation)
  - sāmaveda  (citation)
  - apakarşa  (attribution)
  - gandharva  (citation)
  - mārdava  (attribution)
  - nidarsana  (attribution)
  - nigraha  (attribution)
  - paryagraha  (attribution)
  - svaras  (attribution)
  - utkarşa  (attribution)
  - vaigunya  (attribution)
  - viņā  (attribution)
  - vāgindriya  (attribution)
  - āyatatva  (attribution)
  - śrutis  (attribution)

CONFIDENCE: canonical
PROTECT: true