Calibration 2g.6 — validation humaine du tagging

Rapport · Re-roller

Legende des roles

RoleDefinitionExemple Brihaddesi
mainVers principal du texte (le contenu canonique de l'ouvrage)धैवतश्च निषादश्च गीतौ तुम्बुरुणा स्वरौ ॥७८॥
annotation_inlineCommentaire interligne en petits caracteres (variante manuscrite, glose)मत्सरी / अङ्धी / ₹क
editorial_bracketAjout editorial entre crochets [...] OU note avec marqueur ° / ॰[२. शुद्धाः, विकृताः...] / [अनु ॰ ११५]
footnoteNote de bas de page (au bas de la page, separee du texte)<sup>१३५</sup>षाडवा:
page_headerEn-tete de page (titre du livre, en haut)BRHADDESI
page_footerPied de page (texte au bas, sous le contenu)(texte de pied de page)
page_numberJuste le numero de page, isole (en haut ou en bas)181 / 70 / 46
section_headerTitre d'une section ou sous-section dans la page[२. आर्षभी]
captionLegende d'une figure ou tableauFig. 1 : svaramaṇḍala
list_itemItem d'une liste enumere1. ... 2. ... 3. ...
tableLigne d'un tableau de donnees(colonnes alignees)
verse_numberNumero de verset isole (souvent entre dandas)॥१९०॥ / ॥७८॥
unknownNon classe (l'algo n'a pas su decider)—
5 demi-pages random (seed 20879). Si role auto correct → ne touche rien. Sinon → dropdown. Click sur image pour zoom plein écran. Bouton ? en haut à droite = légende.

vol_II_p058 RIGHT — 35 lignes

page vol_II_p058 RIGHT
L#Texte OCRRole autoCorriger si incorrect
1 99 page_number
via heuristic_pagenum
2 TRANSLATION page_header
via surya_layout
3 [Jāti-bhinna] section_header
via surya_layout
4 Now he (the author) has spoken of the description of jāti-bhinna - main
via surya_layout
5 The amśa of jātis should be established and so should be the sparse and the main
via surya_layout
6 abundant. Sparseness and abundance come about on account of sparse and main
via surya_layout
7 abundant usage. Jāti-bhinnais so called, formed as it is with sūkṣma, atisūkṣma main
via surya_layout
8 (short and very short in time) and curved (phrases).<sup>50</sup> main
via surya_layout
9 (308) annotation_inline
parent ligne 8
via heuristic_height
10 [Anu. 178] section_header
via surya_layout
11 This means-śuddhakaiśika madhyamais born of kaiśiki and ṣadjamadhyamā jā ūs. main
via surya_layout
12 Bhinnakaisikamadhyama, on the other hand, is jāti-bhinna on account of being main
via surya_layout
13 born of the sadjamadhyamā jāti,51 the taking up of its (jāti's) amsaand taking up main
via surya_layout
14 of the sthāyin varņa and is formed with sūkṣma and atisūkṣma (short and very short main
via surya_layout
15 in time) phrases, this is the import. Its description is thus - main
via surya_layout
16 [3. Bhinnakaisikamadhyama] section_header
via surya_layout
17 Bhinnakaisikamadhyamacomes of ṣadjamadhyamā jāti, has ṣadja as its ainśa, main
via surya_layout
18 <math>madhyama</math> as its <math>ny\bar{a}sa</math> and is (endowed) with <math>mandra</math> (low) <math>gamakas^{52} main
via surya_layout
19 (309) annotation_inline
parent ligne 18
via heuristic_height
20 [Anu. 179] editorial_bracket
parent ligne 18
via heuristic_brackets
21 This means-bhinnakaisikamadhyama is related to şadjagrāma on account main
via surya_layout
22 of being born of şadjamadhyamā jāti. Şadja is its graha and ainša. Madhyama main
via surya_layout
23 is the nyāsa. It has mandra (low) gamakas. Niṣāda is kākalī here and this (rāga) main
via surya_layout
24 is complete. It is used in the context of dānavīra i.e. heroism in charity. 53 main
via surya_layout
25 Vīra, raudra and the like are the rasas. The mūrchanā beginning with ṣaḍja main
via surya_layout
26 obtains. Sañcārin is the varņa. Prasannādi is the alankāra. The kalā is formed main
via surya_layout
27 in the dakṣiṇa (mārga), the kalā obtains in the vṛtti (mārga) and the kalā main
via surya_layout
28 prevails in the citra (mārga). A tāla like caccatpuța obtains in the songs main
via surya_layout
29 comprised of svara and pada. main
via surya_layout
30 [Śuddhabhinna] section_header
via surya_layout
31 Now he (the author) has spoken of the definition of śuddhabhinna- main
via surya_layout
32 (The rāga) that bedecks itself with its own jāti (from which it is born) and main
via surya_layout
33 kula (family), leaving the other jāti and taking up (the qualities of) its own main
via surya_layout
34 family, is called <i>śuddhabhinna</i>. main
via surya_layout
35 (310) annotation_inline
parent ligne 34
via heuristic_height

vol_I_p097 RIGHT — 43 lignes

page vol_I_p097 RIGHT
L#Texte OCRRole autoCorriger si incorrect
1 177 page_number
via heuristic_pagenum
2 VIMARŚA annotation_inline
parent ligne 3
via heuristic_height
3 85. Assigning a seer to each svara is, again, an extension of the Vedic main
via surya_layout
4 tradition. annotation_inline
parent ligne 3
via heuristic_height
5 86. The association of rasas with svaras is reproduced from NS XXVII, 103 cd- list_item
via surya_layout
6 105 ab. list_item
via surya_layout
7 87. The location of svaras in the human body as described here is quite list_item
via surya_layout
8 different from the seven sthanas discussed above in note No. 63. list_item
via surya_layout
9 88. 'Desi' here stands for the manifest realm of sound. list_item
via surya_layout
10 Section V ( Grāma-mūrchanā ) section_header
via surya_layout
11 1. Grāma is not just any group of svaras, it is a specific grouping which is the main
via surya_layout
12 basis of the perception of śruti and is also a fundamental categorisation of main
via surya_layout
13 melodies with the consonance of fifth between sa-pa and with the consonance main
via surya_layout
14 of fourth between ri-pa. annotation_inline
parent ligne 13
via heuristic_height
15 2. The analogy of a village inherent in the word grāma is being made main
via surya_layout
16 explicit. BrD is the only text that has explained this point. main
via surya_layout
17 3. NŚ does not mention gāndhāra-grāma; Dattilam (11) and Nā Ši (1.2.6,7) main
via surya_layout
18 do mention it; Dattilam clearly states that it is not to be found here in this world. main
via surya_layout
19 ( See glossary ) annotation_inline
parent ligne 18
via heuristic_height
20 4. The statement that svaras are born of Sāmaveda should be viewed list_item
via surya_layout
21 alongwith the backdrop of the common belief and oft-repeated platitude that list_item
via surya_layout
22 Indian music is born of Sāmaveda. When something is said to be the origin of list_item
via surya_layout
23 another thing, the general impression is that the origin precedes in time the list_item
via surya_layout
24 thing born of it. But in the case of music this impression could not hold good. It list_item
via surya_layout
25 would be absurd to say that there was no music among the people before list_item
via surya_layout
26 Sāmaveda became formalised or codified. The balanced view would be that list_item
via surya_layout
27 Sāmavedic music was the first to be codified and the codification of the music list_item
via surya_layout
28 of the people came later and that the 'vision' that inspired or guided the Vedic list_item
via surya_layout
29 codification continued to guide the later codification. The statement of our list_item
via surya_layout
30 author that svaras are born of Sāmaveda matches the statement in NŚ (I,17) list_item
via surya_layout
31 that gita (music) was taken by Brahmä from Sāmaveda, just as pāthya (text) list_item
via surya_layout
32 was taken from Rgueda, abhinaya (gesture) from Yajurveda and rasa from list_item
via surya_layout
33 Atharvaveda. To go a step further it would be pertinent to say that the mention list_item
via surya_layout
34 of the Vedic origin of a thing need not be taken to imply Vedic anteriority in list_item
via surya_layout
35 time; it could be interpreted to mean that the Vedic world-view and 'vision' was list_item
via surya_layout
36 the guiding spirit. list_item
via surya_layout
37 5. The number 'two' given here for grāma indicates that the author, in spite main
via surya_layout
38 of mentioning gandhara-grama, does not subscribe to the theory of three gramas. main
via surya_layout
39 6. The objective of grāma, stated here as the systematisation of svara, śruti, list_item
via surya_layout
40 mūrchanā, tāna, jāti and nāga is significant. Being a specific arrangement of intervals list_item
via surya_layout
41 in terms of śruti, grāma systematises svara and śruti; the intervals established in grāma list_item
via surya_layout
42 are strictly followed in murchana, the omission of svaras in tana is guided by the grama list_item
via surya_layout
43 (e.g. pañcama being the distinctive svara in madhyama-grāma, cannot be omitted in the list_item
via surya_layout

vol_II_p065 RIGHT — 37 lignes

page vol_II_p065 RIGHT
L#Texte OCRRole autoCorriger si incorrect
1 TRANSLATION page_header
via surya_layout
2 113 page_number
via heuristic_pagenum
3 [5. Boţţa-rāga] section_header
via surya_layout
4 Boṭṭarāgashould be known to be born of ṣaḍjamadhyamājāti and pancamī, main
via surya_layout
5 has pañcama as its amsa and madhyama as the concluding note. main
via surya_layout
6 (324) annotation_inline
parent ligne 5
via heuristic_height
7 [Anu. 196] section_header
via surya_layout
8 This means-bottarāga is related to ṣaḍjagrāma on account of being born of main
via surya_layout
9 şadjamadhyamā and pancamī jātis. Although it is born of two jātis arising out main
via surya_layout
10 of the two grāmas, yet it is related to sadjagrāma because of pañcama being main
via surya_layout
11 comprised of four śrutis. Pañcama is the graha and aniśa, madhyama the nyāsa. main
via surya_layout
12 There is sparseness of niṣāda and gāndhāra. Niṣāda is kākalī here and this main
via surya_layout
13 (rāga) is complete in svaras. Its application is prescribed in festivities. main
via surya_layout
14 Śānta<sup>69</sup> and the like is the rasa. The mūrchanā beginning with paūcama main
via surya_layout
15 obtains. Ārohin is the varņa. Prasannānta is the alankāra. The kalā is formed main
via surya_layout
16 in the dakṣiṇa (mārga), the kalā obtains in the vṛtti (mārga), and the kalā main
via surya_layout
17 prevails in the citra (mārga). A tāla like caccatpuţa obtains in songs comprised main
via surya_layout
18 of svara and pada. annotation_inline
parent ligne 17
via heuristic_height
19 [6. Hindola] section_header
via surya_layout
20 Hindolais combined with ṣaḍja as amśa and nyāsa, is devoid of dhaivata and main
via surya_layout
21 ṛṣabha and is formed with jātis excepting dhaivatī and ārṣabhī, in drama. main
via surya_layout
22 (325) annotation_inline
parent ligne 21
via heuristic_height
23 [Anu. 197] section_header
via surya_layout
24 This means -hindolaka is related to madhyamagrāma. (Contention) Its main
via surya_layout
25 relation with the two grāmas alone is proper on account of its being born of main
via surya_layout
26 all the jātis (of both the grāmas) bearing the names of svaras excluding main
via surya_layout
27 dhaivatī and ārṣabhī and carrying the residue of relationship with ṣaḍjagrāma. main
via surya_layout
28 Why is it said to be based on madhyamagrāma? (Answer) On account of its main
via surya_layout
29 being devoid of dhaivata and ṛṣabha, its relation with madhyamagrāma alone main
via surya_layout
30 is justified because authorities like Bharata and Kohala have treated the main
via surya_layout
31 omission of dhaivata and ṛṣabha in ṣadjagrāma as undesirable.70 main
via surya_layout
32 Some hold that it is based in sadjagrāma alone because pañcama comprised main
via surya_layout
33 of four śrutis is obtained here. The inomissibility of dhaivata should be main
via surya_layout
34 viewed only with respect to tāna and does not hold good everywhere. This main
via surya_layout
35 is improper. If this be so, then there would be no distinction between grāma main
via surya_layout
36 and mürchanā<sup>71</sup> annotation_inline
parent ligne 35
via heuristic_height
37 , annotation_inline
parent ligne 35
via heuristic_height

vol_II_p055 LEFT — 26 lignes

page vol_II_p055 LEFT
L#Texte OCRRole autoCorriger si incorrect
1 BRHADDESI page_header
via surya_layout
2 92 page_number
via heuristic_pagenum
3 [अनुः १६९] editorial_bracket
parent ligne 5
via heuristic_brackets
4 अस्यार्थ: - शुद्धकैशिको नाम[रागो] मध्यमग्रामसम्बन्धः, कैशिकोकार्मारवीजातिभ्यां editorial_bracket
parent ligne 5
via heuristic_brackets
5 समुत्पन्नत्वात्। तारषड्जोऽस्य ग्रहोंऽशश्च। पञ्चमो न्यासः। निषादीऽत्र काकली। पूर्णस्वरश्चायम् , main
via surya_layout
6 ग्रह: अंश(स्व?ध) annotation_inline
parent ligne 5
via heuristic_height
7 चित्रस्याष्ट्रादशाङ्गस्य [?]निर्वहणे विनियोगः। वीररौद्रादिको रसः।षङ्जादिमूर्छना। आरोही वर्णः। editorial_bracket
parent ligne 5
via heuristic_brackets
8 <sup>४६</sup>प्रसन्नादिरलङ्कार:। दक्षिणे कला,वृत्तौ कला,चित्रे कला । स्वरपदगीते चच्चत्पुटादिताल:। main
via surya_layout
9 [शुद्धरागाणां ग्रामविभागः] section_header
via surya_layout
10 [अनु॰ १७०] editorial_bracket
parent ligne 9
via heuristic_brackets
11 ननु एते ग्रामविशेषसम्बन्धाः, कुतोऽयं विशेषलाभः ? उच्यते, भरतवचनादेवासौ विशेषो main
via surya_layout
12 कु(तो ऽ)यं annotation_inline
parent ligne 11
via heuristic_height
13 लभ्यते । तथा चाह भरतमुनि: - ''जातिसम्भूतत्वाद् ग्रामरागाणाम्''४० इति , ''यत्किञ्चिद् main
via surya_layout
14 गीयते लोके तत्सर्वं जातिषु स्थितम् ' '४८ इति वचनात् । तथा काश्यपेनाप्युक्तम् - main
via surya_layout
15 तत्सर्व annotation_inline
parent ligne 14
via heuristic_height
16 ''षाडवो मध्यमग्रामे पञ्चम: कैशिकस्तथा । main
via surya_layout
17 पाडवे ककुभ् annotation_inline
parent ligne 16
via heuristic_height
18 षड्जे साधारितश्चैव तथा कैशिकमध्यम:॥'' main
via surya_layout
19 [शुद्धरागाणां विनियोगः] section_header
via surya_layout
20 [अनु॰ १७१] editorial_bracket
parent ligne 19
via heuristic_brackets
21 ननु अमी विनियोग-विशेषा: कस्माल्लभ्यन्ते ? [मुनि-] वचनादेव लभ्यन्ते। तथा editorial_bracket
parent ligne 19
via heuristic_brackets
22 अ(यं ?मी) annotation_inline
parent ligne 19
via heuristic_height
23 चाह भरत:- annotation_inline
parent ligne 19
via heuristic_height
24 ‘‘मुखे तु मध्यमग्राम: षड्ज: प्रतिमुखे भवेत् । main
via surya_layout
25 गर्भे साधारितश्चैव <sup>४९</sup>ह्मवमर्शे तु पञ्चम: ॥ main
via surya_layout
26 ...वावमर्शे • तु annotation_inline
parent ligne 25
via heuristic_height

vol_II_p014 RIGHT — 38 lignes

page vol_II_p014 RIGHT
L#Texte OCRRole autoCorriger si incorrect
1 n er annotation_inline
parent ligne 4
via heuristic_height
2 11 page_number
via heuristic_pagenum
3 TRANSLATION page_header
via surya_layout
4 the jātis (castes). Just as in human beings there are castes such as brahmin main
via surya_layout
5 and the like, that are both pure and mixed (or altered), similarly these jātis main
via surya_layout
6 are also (twofold). annotation_inline
parent ligne 5
via heuristic_height
7 [Thus ends the general definition.] editorial_bracket
parent ligne 5
via heuristic_brackets
8 [4. The tenfold lakṣaṇas or characteristics] section_header
via surya_layout
9 Now he (the author) spoke (speaks) about the tenfold lakṣaṇa - main
via surya_layout
10 Graha (initial note), amśa (fundamental note), tāra (high), mandra (low) main
via surya_layout
11 and ṣāḍava (hexatonic) and similarly auḍuvita (pentatonic) and similarly main
via surya_layout
12 alpatva (sparseness), bahutva (profusion) and nyāsa and apanyāsa - these are main
via surya_layout
13 said to form the group of ten jāti-lakṣaṇas that operate in the respective jātis. main
via surya_layout
14 The definition of this group of ten is being given in brief. main
via surya_layout
15 <math>(209-210)</math> annotation_inline
parent ligne 14
via heuristic_height
16 [1. The definition of graha] section_header
via surya_layout
17 [Anu.119] editorial_bracket
parent ligne 16
via heuristic_brackets
18 Out of these (lakṣaṇas), graha is that with which the performance of jāti main
via surya_layout
19 and the like is begun (lit . held or caught). That ( graha ) should be known main
via surya_layout
20 to have sixty-three varieties just like aniśa. main
via surya_layout
21 (Objection) What is the difference between graha and anisa? It is being main
via surya_layout
22 answered - amśa is vādī alone i.e. only the vādī 10 is prescribed to be the main
via surya_layout
23 amsa,but graha is fourfold according to the distinction of vādī and the like main
via surya_layout
24 1 page_number
via heuristic_pagenum
25 (samvādī, vivādī and anuvādī). Or there is the distinction of predominance main
via surya_layout
26 and subordination between the two. Graha is subordinate ( to amśa). main
via surya_layout
27 ŧ annotation_inline
parent ligne 26
via heuristic_height
28 (Objection) Why is the predominance of amsa alone being spoken of? main
via surya_layout
29 Because of its being the progenitor 11 of raga (delight or colour) and main
via surya_layout
30 because of its being pervasive, the predominance of anisa alone (is accepted). main
via surya_layout
31 Although graha and anisa are predominant in all the jatis and this is proved main
via surya_layout
32 by utsarga<sup>12</sup> (general rule), yet it is being prescribed through the vidhi<sup>13</sup> main
via surya_layout
33 (operation) of samvādī and anuvādī. main
via surya_layout
34 Similarly said Bharata – annotation_inline
parent ligne 33
via heuristic_height
35 "Graha is said to be like the amsa in all the jātis. The amsa that becomes the main
via surya_layout
36 starting point of geya (melodic organisation and performance) assumes an main
via surya_layout
37 alternative form as graha." main
via surya_layout
38 (NŚ XXVIII.67) main
via surya_layout
179 lignes a valider — change uniquement les roles incorrects.