BRHADDEŚ1
mūrchanā). No later author has repeated this statement of BrD. Kumbhā has
positively said that no
murchana could begin with antara or kakali, without
mentioning that
Matanga has accepted this. A different interpretation could
resolve this contradiction and that is thus—the
mūrchanās meant to begin with
antara and kākalī are included in the
sādharaņa-mūrchanās i.e. the
mūrchanā
meant to begin with antara 'ga' will begin with the normal 'ga' and take only
hākali 'ni' and the
mūrchanā meant to begin with kākali 'ni' will begin with the
normal 'ni' and take antara 'ga'. This interpretation is corroborated by
Kallinātha (SRI Kalā, p. 108).
41. The performance of tana is being discussed here in the context of an
open-stringed viṇā, where there is a separate string for each svara.
42. The string on which the svara to be omitted is tuned has to be 'merged'
into the next higher or previous lower string by retuning for 'augmenting' or
'lowering' respectively.
43. The reference is obviously to NS XVII, 106 -
शारीर्यामध बीणाया त्रिभ्यः स्थानेभ्य एव तु ।
उरसः शिरसः कण्ठात् स्वरः काफु प्रवर्तते ॥
"In the
śārīrī (bodily) viņā the svara or kāku (tonal inflexion) proceeds
from three sthānas alone; viz. chest, cerebrum and throat".
44, 45. In the context of the act of omission, nigraha has been explained as a
way of omitting a svara viz. 'non-touching' of the string that is tuned to the
svara to be omitted. But here nigraha is paired with
paryagraha as an alternative
( va ) and the pair has been explained by
Abhinavagupta ( vide Abhi Bha on
NS XXVIII, p. 27); nigraha as standing for use of low svaras (
mandrakriyā )
and
paryagraha as standing for the use of high svaras (
tārakriyā ). The other
explanation given by him is that nigraha is graha (taking up) in totality and
paryagraha is absence of taking up in totality i.e. nigraha is associated with
pūrņasvaratā (complete use of svaras) and
paryagraha with
apūrņasvaratā
(incomplete use of svaras).
Madhyama is indestructible or non-omissible
whether there is complete or incomplete use of svaras.
46. The tonal range of the human voice is limited; in most of the cases it may
not completely cover the three registers. But in viņā there is no such limitation.
In open-stringed instruments, twenty-one strings would complete three sthanas.
Abhinavagupta has given the name
mattakokilā for the twenty-one-stringed viņā
(vide
Abhi Bhā on NŠ XXVIII, 112, p. 122). In the
rudraviņā (of zither type)
described in texts of the 16th and 17th centuries, there are four registers, the
anumandra (lower than lower) being the fourth one.
47. The purport is that in the first
murchana beginning with sadja if sadja is omitted,
the omitted svara will be mandra (low, the first one); but when sadja is omitted in the
seventh murchanā beginning with rsabha, then the omitted svara will be in tāra (high,
the seventh one ). In writing, both will look alike; in hearing also the omission of the
lower sadja will become clear if its previous svara viz. low nisāda is also used, similarly
the omission of the higher sadja will become obvious if the next svara viz.high rsabha