vol_II_p134 — Bṛhaddeśī

Devanāgarī

BRHADDEŠĪ 66. Jbid. 67. Reading of Datti 73. 68. 'Tu heyāvṛ' - reading of Datti 74. 69. Reading of Datti 74. 70. Reading of Datti 75. 71. Ibid. 72. Ibid. 73. This reading of p.t. is corrupt; it seems to be repeated from verse 214, where dhaivatī is described. 74. Reading of Datti 80. 75. Reading of Datti 81. 76. Reading of Datti 82. 77. Reading of Datti 83; also ‘pañcamyāṁ’. 78. Reading of Datti 84. 79. Reading of Datti 87; we have accepted p.t. on the basis of NS XXVIII. 85. 8().cf. अन्ये तु मतङ्गादयस्तु निधयोरंशयोर्निगपांस्त्रीनिप न्यासान् विदु। 'धैवतनिपादयोरंशत्वे पञ्चमोऽपि न्यासः' इति

मतङ्गोक्तत्वात्।

Kalā on SR I. 7.95-98, p.245. 81. Matching reading for this prose portion is not found in Datti. P.t. puts this as a verse. 82. P.t. adds the following before this line:-

इति त्रिपष्टिरंशा ये तेषामेकैकशोंऽशताम् ॥

प्रकल्प्यापोद्यते प्राप्तपाडवौडुवितं क्वचित् ।

अपाडवा एते ।

त्रिषष्टिरंशा एतेपामंशो न ज?ाति +++++ ॥

This portion is misplaced here, as this topic is dealt with in verse 251-255 of our text. In Datti. verse 90b-95 deals with this topic at this very point and there it is not out of place; but our text goes on to speak of gaņas (groupings) of jātis after 238cd; hence we have omitted this portion here, it does recur at verse 251 which is the proper place. 83.Reading of NŚ XXVIII, 91. 84. Reading of NŚ XXVIII. 92; also 'vardhamānasvarā'. 85. Reading of NŚ XXVIII, 93. 86. Reconstruction based on ibid. 87. Datti 87 reads - maridhanayo'mśāḥ i.e. 'ma 'is mentioned there instead of 'pa' of our text.

English — Sharma

88. ८ि. जात्यंशगतानि यानि दशकरूपाणि ताञ्चशणान्युकानि तत्सङ्कीर्णतया यन् मिश्रम् । गेयं ग्रामरागादिलक्षणम् । तद्यदि कस्योपि जात्यंशकस्य सम्बन्ध्यंशोऽन्यस्य न्यासोऽन्यदीयोऽपन्यास इत्यादि बहुतरवैचित्र्यम् । तदेवम्भूतं यन्मिश्रगेयं तदस्या जातेरर्थितमितिक्रममिश्रितम्। यत्रियम्यते मतङ्गनन्दिकश्यपयाष्टिकादिभिस्तद्धिकेन रूपबाहुल्येन । तथा(विहि)तं पानकमिदमिति न तु Abhi Bhā on NŚ XXVIII. 141, p. 63.²

89. cf. इति त्रिपष्टिरंशा: स्युस्तेपामेकैकशोंऽशता ।

C.r. in Sudhā on SR I. 7.59-63. Verses 251-256 of our text tally with Datti 90b-95.⁹⁶ 90. P.t. adds here a confused reading after 'madhye' - ये अनंशास्तेषामनंशानां 91. The order of ṛṣabha-dhaivata has been changed by us to dhaivata- rṣabha in order to correct the respective order of kaiśikī and pañcamī. 92. C.r. in Sudhā on SR I.7.24-28, p.180. P.t. reads the following after kriyamaņe in the first line of Anu. 139, which is redundant-

सप्तधिकश्चैवं चत्वारिशच्च पाडवे अस्यार्थविधौ क्रियमाणे ।

93. C. r. in Sudhā on SR 1.7.24-28, p.180, reads - सप्तचत्वारिंशदंशा भवन्ति । कथम् ? चतसृणां etc. 94. C. r. in ibid. 95.cf. c.r. in ibid -

पड्जमध्यमा पाड्जी पड्जोदोच्यवा कैशिकी रक्तगान्धारीत्यासां सप्तांशा अपवादभूता: पातनीया: ।

P.t. adds the following portion after verse 257, which is out of place and has, therefore, been omitted by us-

सगमपर्धः स्मृता +++++++ ।

नन्दयन्ती भवेत् पागा गान्धारोदीच्यवासमा ॥

96. C.r. in Sudhā on SR I. 7.24-28, p.180. 97. Reading in NS Chau. XXVIII. 93. 98. Reading in NS XXVIII. 58. 99. Ibid. 100. Reading in NS Chau. XXVIII.63. 101. P.t. reads - 'tadvaddhaivatahīnatā'. Reconstruction based on NŠ XXVIII. 59. 102. Reading in NS Chau. XXVIII. 63. 103. Reading in NS XXVIII. 59 and NS Chau. XXVIII. 64. Recon- struction of 'pañcamaḥ'as 'pañcamam 'based on NŚ Chau. XXVIII. 64. 104, 105.Reading in NS XXVIII. 60. 106, 107. Reading in NS Chau. XXVIII .64. 108. Reading in NŚ XXVIII. 61. 109. Added on the basis of NS XXVIII. 61.

Sanskrit attestations (1)

8.[structural]jātis have anśas (components) that can be classified into ten-fold forms and mixed varietiesज?ात्यंशगतानि यानि दशकरूपाणि ताञ्चशणान्युकानि तत्सङ्कीर्णतया यन् मिश्रम्

English attestations (8)

1.[citation]dhaivatī is described in verse 214 of the textThis reading of p.t. is corrupt; it seems to be repeated from verse 214, where dhaivatī is described.

2.[citation]Abhi Bhā contains commentary on NŚ XXVIII. 141 at page 63Abhi Bhā on NŚ XXVIII. 141, p. 63.

3.[citation]Sudhā contains commentary on SR I. 7.24-28 at page 180C. r. in Sudhā on SR I.7.24-28, p.180

4.[relation]The order of kaiśikī has been corrected in relation to the order of ṛṣabha-dhaivataThe order of ṛṣabha-dhaivata has been changed by us to dhaivata- ṛṣabha in order to correct the respective order of kaiśikī and pañcamī.

5.[relation]The order of pañcamī has been corrected in relation to the order of dhaivata-ṛṣabhaThe order of ṛṣabha-dhaivata has been changed by us to dhaivata- ṛṣabha in order to correct the respective order of kaiśikī and pañcamī.

6.[relation]Verses 251-256 of the Brhaddešī tally with Datti 90b-95Verses 251-256 of our text tally with Datti 90b-95.

7.[structural]gaņas (groupings) of jātis are discussed after verse 238cd in the textbut our text goes on to speak of gaņas (groupings) of jātis after 238cd

9.[structural]The Brhaddešī discusses jātis and their classification over multiple verses (251-256)Verses 251-256 of our text tally with Datti 90b-95.