19. This sentence has been repeated in the MSS; the ed. has put it in
paranthesis with a sign of interrogation.
20. MS A reading as recorded by the ed.
21. Verses 102 and 103 are both in the
āryā metre, but they have been
treated as prose in the P.t.
22. P.t. gives the first two sets of
hexatonic tanas in the descending order like
ni-dha-pa-ma-ga-ri etc. These have been changed by us into the ascending order;
the crosses indicating the omitted svaras have also been added by us for the sake
of clarity.
23. cf. (a) ननु कथ मूर्छनातानयोर्भेदः प्रतिपादितः, उच्यते ।
आरोहाबरोहक्रमयुक्तः स्वरसमुदायो मूर्छनेत्युच्यते ।
तानस्तु आरोहक्रमेण भवतीति भेदः ।
(
Saṃ S Sā, p. 18 )
(b) यद्यपि
मूर्छना एव शुद्धास्तानाः स्युरित्युक्तौ तानेष्वारोहावरोहत्व प्रतीयते, तथापि मतङ्गमतेनारोह एव
तान इति जेयम्। तथा च मतङ्गः —ननु कथ मूर्छनातानयोर्भेद ? उच्यते। आरोहावरोहक्रमयुक्तः स्वरसमुदायो
मुर्छनेत्युच्यते,
तानस्त्वारोहण भवतीति भेदः ।4
( Rā Vi, p. 31 )
24. C.r. in
S R I Sudhā, p. 114.
25. C.r. in Bha Ko, p. 502.
26. C.r. ( as in no. 24 ).
27. C.r. in Bha Ko, p. 502 adds 'bharatasya' in the beginning of the sentence.
28. C.r. in
S R I Sudhā, p. 114 reads -
ननु कथ मूर्छनातानयोर्भेदः ? वूमः ।
29. Portion added from
Sam S Sa, p. 18;
S R I Sudha, p. 114 and Ra Vi, p.
31.
30. P.t. modified on the basis of ibid.
31. P.t. adds 'svarasystih?' after this, but it is totally out of context.
32,33,34. Our reconstruction is based on S R I, 4. 74.
35. Our reconstruction is based on S. Raj II, 1.1.457. The chart illustrating
these tānas in S. Rāj I, p. 133 reads 'balabhṛt' and 'nāgayakşa'; S R I,4.76 reads
balabhinnāgapakṣakaḥ.
36,37,38. Our reconstruction is based on S R I, 4.77.
39. S R I, 4.77.
40,41,42. Our reconstruction is based on S R I, 4.79.
43. ibid., verse 80.
44. Reconstruction based on S R I, 4.82 and S. Rāj II, 1.1.465.
45,46. Reconstruction based on S R I, 4. 83 and S. Rāj II, 1.1.467.
47. Reading in S R I, 4.84 and S. Rāj II, 1.1.468.
48. ibid.
49. Reconstruction based on ibid.
50. Reconstruction based on S R I, 4.85 and S. Rāj II, 1.1.469.
