samvādī - concept

Grammar record (family: `svara_role`)

constraint_type

cannot be omitted

p.vol_II_p027, conf 0.85

Generative rules (2) ↗ filter all

R_c217_samvadi relation · 3 att.
saṃvādī = note consonante de l'aṃśa, non-omissible; cette contrainte empêche 7 aṃśas spécifiques de former ṣāḍava
R_739_01 validation · 1 att.
Omission of samvadi of amsa forbidden in jāti transformation

Pseudocode (DSL v1.1) ↗ full DSL (raw text)

RULE id: samvādī (cluster 217)
SCOPE: svara_role family
STATUS: canonical
CONFIDENCE: canonical
PROTECT: true

RECORD:
  constraint_type = cannot be omitted

Essence pseudocode — identity + RECORD. The page citations for each slot value are in the Grammar record table above (audit trail). The full DSL adds ASSERTIONS with verbatim quotes (see Affirmations below) and CITED_RULES (see Graph relations).

Graph relations

Outgoing (10)

--[relation]--> aṁśa (4)--[relation]--> ṣāḍava (3)--[structural]--> aṁśa (1)--[structural]--> ṣāḍava (1)--[relation]--> gāndhāra (1)--[structural]--> gāndhāra (1)--[structural]--> jāti (1)--[structural]--> niṣāda (1)--[relation]--> svaras (1)--[structural]--> madhyama (1)

Incoming (4)

aṁśa --[structural]--> (1)ṣāḍava --[definition]--> (1)ṣāḍava --[structural]--> (1)vādī --[structural]--> (1)

Affirmations (4)

relation

p.vol_II_p027

english

conf 0.92

[show source]

The samvādī of the aṁśa cannot be omitted in forming ṣāḍava variations

"because of the negation of the omission of the samvādī of the aṁśa"

37 TRANSLATION [ Anu. 136] This means that kaiśikī, raktagāndhārī and gāndhārī, these three jātis do not become ṣāḍava on account of (the omission of) ṛṣabha, on pañcama being the aṁśa, because of the negation of the omission of the samvādī of the aṁśa. Similarly, ṣāḍjī does not become ṣāḍava through (the omission of) niṣāda, on gāndhāra being the aniśa (and) ṣadjodīcyavā should be known as not being ṣāḍava through (the omission of) ṛṣabha, on dhaivata being the ainsa. Now the giving up of the formation of auduvita that is obtained (due to presription) is being prohibited (lit. its giving up is being prescribed). In gāndhārī and raktagāndhārī, ṣaḍja, madhyama (and) pañcama alongwith niṣāda are known as the amśas in which the formation of auduvita does not operate. (254) [ Anu. 137 ] (Contention) And this is incongruous because the formation of auduvita is not obtained (through prescription). Truly has this been said. By the statement negating the formation of auduvita, the auduvita obtained on account of precription alone is prohibited. In ṣadjamadhyamā jāti, gāndhāra and then niṣāda and then in kaiśikī and dhaivatī, dhaivata and ṛṣabha respectively (are the svaras that are not omitted for making auduva forms of the respective jātis when the above are aniśas). (255) [ Anu. 138 ] This means that in ṣadjamadhyamā, gāndhāra and then niṣāda are not entitled to form auduvita. Dhaivatain kaiśikī and ṛṣabhain pañcamī are not entitled to form auduvita. The prohibition applies only to the auduvita that is obtained through prescription. And the state of being anisa is being hypothetically considered without its being obtained (?) Now, he (the author) draws out the svaras that do not become exceptions in the formation of ṣāḍava and auḍuvita. Forty-seven (svaras) are to be applied in the formation of ṣāḍava. (256) [ Anu. 139] This means that in the formation of ṣāḍava, forty-seven ainśas are to be

relation

p.vol_II_p029

english

conf 0.95

[show source]

The non-omission of the samvādī (consonant note) prevents certain jātī forms from being ṣāḍava

"because of the non-omission of the samvādī (of the amsa); similarly it is not desired to be so when gandhara (is the amsa)."

relation

p.vol_II_p029

english

conf 0.85

[show source]

Seven specific aṁśas are devoid of ṣāḍava-forming capacity due to samvādī non-omission

"These seven (amśas) are devoid of the state of making six svara forms."

structural

p.vol_II_p026

english

conf 0.94

[show source]

The omission of a samvadi of the amsa is not accepted in jāti transformations

"Şādja-madhyamā does not become ṣāḍava on niṣāda being amsaand also on gandhara (being amsa), because the omission of a samvadi of the amsa is not accepted."

TRANSLATION 35 When pūrvaraiga is performed the organisers of song should use the śuddhā (jātis) in āsārita,47 pāņikā 48 and the like and after that the formation (alteration) of anisas of jātis (should be taken up). (249) Along with the order of \bar{a}s\bar{a}ritas^{49} and because of that of the angah\bar{a}ras^{50} the formation or variation of amsas in their svaras i.e. in svaras of jatis should be done in the text of vardhamāna51 (250) [8. The ṣāḍava and auḍava formation of jātis] The sixty-three amsas that have thus been spoken of, out of them each one is accorded the position of ainsa (at a given time) (and accordingly) the ṣāḍava and auḍava formation that is obtained (on account of rule or prescription) is sometimes given up. (251) [ Anu. 134 ] The sixty-three amsas that have been spoken of, out of them each one has to be arranged as anisa (in a given melodic set-up). (In specific situations created by the arrangement of different anisas) sometimes the formation of ṣāḍavita and auḍuvita that is obtained in the context of a given jāti, is given up. He (the author) clarifies this itself. Şādja-madhyamā does not become ṣāḍava on niṣāda being amsaand also on gandhara (being amsa), because ^{52} the omission of a samvadi of the amsa is not accepted. (252) [ Anu. 135 ] This means that on niṣāda being the aṁśa, the jāti ṣadjamadhyā does not become ṣāḍava. Why? In ṣaḍja-grāma, in the prescription about ṣāḍava the omission of gandhara is not there. On gandhara being aṁśa, it should be known to be non-ṣāḍava by omission of niṣāda because of the negation of the omission of the sanivādī of the aniśa. Kaiśikī, raktagāndhārī (and) gāndhāri, (these three jātis do not become ṣāḍava) when pañcama is aṁśa, (by the omission of ṛṣabha on account of the negation of the omission of the samvādī of the aṁśa). Similarly, ṣāḍjī does not become ṣāḍava through (the omission of niṣāda) on gāndhāra being the aṁśa and şadjodicyavā should be known not to be şādava (through the omission of ṛṣabha ) on dhaivata being the aṁśa. (253)

samvādī svara_role

Grammar record (family: svara_role)

Generative rules (2) ↗ filter all

Pseudocode (DSL v1.1) ↗ full DSL (raw text)

Graph relations

Outgoing (10)

Incoming (4)

Affirmations (4)

Grammar record (family: `svara_role`)