85. Assigning a seer to each svara is, again, an extension of the Vedic
tradition.
86. The association of rasas with svaras is reproduced from NS XXVII, 103 cd-
105 ab.
87. The location of svaras in the human body as described here is quite
different from the seven sthanas discussed above in note No. 63.
88. 'Desi' here stands for the manifest realm of sound.
1.
Grāma is not just any group of svaras, it is a specific grouping which is the
basis of the perception of śruti8 and is also a fundamental categorisation of
melodies with the consonance of fifth between sa-pa and with the consonance
of fourth between ri-pa.13
2. The analogy of a village inherent in the word grāma is being made
explicit. BrD is the only text that has explained this point.
3.
NŚ does not mention gāndhāra-grāma; Dattilam (11) and Nā Ši (1.2.6,7)
do mention it; Dattilam clearly states that it is not to be found here in this world.4
( See glossary )
4. The statement that svaras are born of
Sāmaveda should be viewed
alongwith the backdrop of the common belief and oft-repeated platitude that
Indian music is born of
Sāmaveda. When something is said to be the origin of
another thing, the general impression is that the origin precedes in time the
thing born of it. But in the case of music this impression could not hold good. It
would be absurd to say that there was no music among the people before
Sāmaveda became formalised or codified. The balanced view would be that
Sāmavedic music was the first to be codified and the codification of the music
of the people came later and that the 'vision' that inspired or guided the Vedic
codification continued to guide the later codification. The statement of our
author that svaras are born of
Sāmaveda matches the statement in NŚ (I,17)
that gita (music) was taken by Brahmä from
Sāmaveda, just as pāthya (text)
was taken from Rgueda,
abhinaya (gesture) from
Yajurveda and rasa from
Atharvaveda. To go a step further it would be pertinent to say that the mention
of the Vedic origin of a thing need not be taken to imply Vedic anteriority in
time; it could be interpreted to mean that the Vedic world-view and 'vision' was
the guiding spirit.
5. The number 'two' given here for grāma indicates that the author, in spite
of mentioning
gandhara-grama, does not subscribe to the theory of three gramas.
6. The objective of grāma, stated here as the systematisation of svara, śruti,
mūrchanā, tāna, jāti and nāga is significant. Being a specific arrangement of intervals
in terms of śruti, grāma systematises svara and śruti; the intervals established in grāma
are strictly followed in
murchana, the omission of svaras in tana is guided by the grama
(e.g.
pañcama being the distinctive svara in
madhyama-grāma, cannot be omitted in the