Source scans · vol_II_p163
recto · open full
scan recto
verso · open full
scan verso
Bṛhaddeśī · Volume II
pp. 308–309folio 163
Bṛhaddeśī
associated with any specific varṇa are grouped under rāga-gīti. The history of this name is obscure. 65. The association with Lakşmī points towards the use of specific rāgas in tantric rituals. 66. The incompatibility of vīra with śānta is again notable. 67. Here śringara is mentioned in viniyoga and again śringara and hāsya are mentioned as the rasas indicated by the amsa, hence there is no incompatibility. 68. The mention of śānta rasa in viniyoga is a post-Bharata development; the incompatibility of śṛṅgāra with śānta is also notable. 69. 'Festivities' under viniyoga and śānta are again incompatible. 70. Bharata's text does not contain any statement to the effect that dhaivata and ṛṣabha should not be omitted in ṣadjagrāma. Abhi (Abhi. Bhā. on NS XXVIII. 21) does cite Datti 1. 20 to the effect that pancama in madhyamagrāma, dhaivata in ṣaḍjagrāma and madhyama in all situations is inomissible. The statement of Kohala to this effect is not available to-day. 71. The omission of svaras is operative only in mūrchanās and not in grāma; this seems to be the import. It also seems to be intended that omission not only operates in mūrchanās that become tānas through the omission, but also in jātis, rāgas and the like that are melodic extensions of mūrchanā or tāna. 72. The incompatibility between śringāra and vīra is notable. 73. Bībhatsa rasa is incompatible with viniyoga prescribed here. 74. Śringarā and vīra are incompatible. 75. 'Vesara' (lit. mule) is also read as 'vegasara' (Monier Williams), it has here been revised as vega-svara. 76. The prominence of ṣāḍava rāga is once again indicated as a point of reference for other rāgas. 77,78,79. The incompatibility between passionate performance of cārī-maṇḍala and combat on the one hand and śṛṅgāra on the other hand is again notable. 80. Here the rasa is indicated viz. vīra is one of those mentioned under viniyoga. 81. S Rāj. (II.2.1.537) mentions kakubha as belonging to two grāmas. 82. Here karuņa appears both inthe viniyoga and as a prescribed rasa. 83. The situations mentioned under viniyoga and the rasa vīra, are incompatible. 84. Vīra and karuņa under viniyoga and only karuņa as rasa is notable.
translation
85. The gandhara and that too antara becomes the dhaivata of madhyamagrāma. Perhaps this phenomenon is being indicated here. 86,87. Adbhuta and hasya on the one hand and karuna on the other are incompatible. 88. The freedom of the performer is being indicated here. 89,90,91. The situations mentioned under viniyoga and the rasa vīra are perfectly compatible. 92. Yuddhavīra is one of the four varieties of vīra rasa. See note 53. 93. The indication of murchana finds place in the description of jatis for the first time. No rule is prescribed for assigning a particular mūrchanā to a given jāti. Here it is said that the mūrchanā of jāti is known from the 'statements of authorities', which implies that there is no prescribed rule. 94. The import seems to be that the amsa that is predominant among amsas (in the case of jātis with more than one amsa) determines the mūrchanā of a jāti. 95. The four components of gita have been enumerated as svara, pada, tāla and mārga (vide citation in the name of Kasyapa in Kalā on SR II.30-32). 96. Dhruvāis a metrical text that is performed in pūrvaranga, where the compositions in Sanskrit or in prescribed non-lexical syllables are used. The dhruvā performed within the drama is invariably in Prākṛta and provides a figurative and poetic commentary on the happenings in the drama. NS XXXII gives numerous illustrations of dhruvā texts. 97. The ten forms of rūpaka are described in NS XVIII; they are - nāṭaka, prakaraṇa, aṅka, vyāyoga, bhāṇa, samavakāra, vīthī, prahasana, ḍima and īhāmṛga. 98. Prastāvanā(lit.introduction) is twofold, one occurring in the end of the Pūrvaranga and the other in the beginning of the play immediately after nāndī i.e. one is composed by the sūtradhāra known as director and the other by the poet called playwright to-day. 99. Mukha and pratimukha are the first two among the five sandhis or junctures of drama. 100,101. Garbha is the third sandhi and avamarsa (another name for vimarsa) is the fourth one.
Chapter IV
(The description of bhāṣās)
[A. Bhāṣās according to Yāṣṭika]
1. This whole portion on bhāṣās according to Yāṣṭika seems to form part of an independent text. We have retained it in our reconstructed text as it embodies very valuable material, but we have numbered its verses
1.[citation]Bharata's Nāṭyaśāstra does not contain a statement that dhaivata and ṛṣabha should not be omitted in ṣadjagrāmaBharata's text does not contain any statement to the effect that dhaivata and ṛṣabha should not be omitted in ṣadjagrāma.
2.[citation]NS (Nāṭyaśāstra) provides numerous illustrations of dhruvā textsNS XXXII gives numerous illustrations of dhruvā texts.
3.[definition]Rāgas not associated with any specific varṇa are grouped under the category of rāga-gītiassociated with any specific varṇa are grouped under rāga-gīti. The history of this name is obscure.
4.[definition]Dhruvā is a metrical text performed in pūrvaranga using Sanskrit or prescribed non-lexical syllables, and within drama it is in PrākṛtaDhruvāis a metrical text that is performed in pūrvaranga, where the compositions in Sanskrit or in prescribed non-lexical syllables are used. The dhruvā performed within the drama is invariably in Prākṛta and provides a figurative and poetic commentary on the happenings in the dr
5.[enumeration]Rūpaka has ten forms enumerated in NS XVIIIThe ten forms of rūpaka are described in NS XVIII; they are - nāṭaka, prakaraṇa, aṅka, vyāyoga, bhāṇa, samavakāra, vīthī, prahasana, ḍima and īhāmṛga.
6.[enumeration]Sandhis are junctures of drama; mukha and pratimukha are the first two among five sandhisMukha and pratimukha are the first two among the five sandhis or junctures of drama.
7.[enumeration]Pada is one of four components of gīta, along with svara, tāla, and mārgaThe four components of gita have been enumerated as svara, pada, tāla and mārga
8.[relation]The predominant amsa among multiple amsas determines the mūrchanā of a jātithe amsa that is predominant among amsas (in the case of jātis with more than one amsa) determines the mūrchanā of a jāti.
9.[structural]Dhaivata should not be omitted in ṣadjagrāma according to cited authoritiesdhaivata in ṣaḍjagrāma and madhyama in all situations is inomissible.
10.[structural]The omission of svaras is operative in mūrchanās and extends to melodic extensions like jātis and rāgasThe omission of svaras is operative only in mūrchanās and not in grāma; this seems to be the import. It also seems to be intended that omission not only operates in mūrchanās that become tānas through the omission, but also in jātis, rāgas and the like that are melodic extensions
11.[structural]Ṣāḍava rāga is prominent and serves as a point of reference for other rāgasThe prominence of ṣāḍava rāga is once again indicated as a point of reference for other rāgas.
12.[structural]The mūrchanā of jāti is known from statements of authorities without a prescribed ruleNo rule is prescribed for assigning a particular mūrchanā to a given jāti. Here it is said that the mūrchanā of jāti is known from the 'statements of authorities', which implies that there is no prescribed rule.
13.[structural]Pancama in madhyamagrāma is inomissible according to Dattipancama in mādhyamagrāma, dhaivata in ṣaḍjagrāma and madhyama in all situations is inomissible.